--- 02/assignment2.tex	2003/12/12 14:52:20	1.7
+++ 02/assignment2.tex	2003/12/12 18:00:24	1.9
@@ -154,7 +154,23 @@
             \item Which of the two systems can be expected to require more
             effort to be built? Why?
         \end{itemize}
-            svar
+            We expect design 2 to become more complex, both since
+            it has more use cases, but also since it has higher
+            values (in general) on the metrics suit.
+
+            We expect design 2 to require more effort to build
+            since it has more use cases and more actions (more
+            functionality). Also since we feel that design 2 has a
+            higher complexity. Also most of the values that we can
+            get out from our metrics suit are greater, both in
+            total and if we count them per use case.
+
+            We feel that it is hard to make good (accurate)
+            estimations based on this suit only and we also feel
+            that while good estimations on use case level can be
+            made using this suit, it is not a good thing to try to
+            make estimations of the system as a whole only based
+            on this information.
   \\ \\ \textbf{Measuring designs}
   \subsection{Measure the class diagram presented in Design 1 using the CK metrics suite presented on the
     lecture.}
@@ -175,10 +191,10 @@
             diagrams? Why?
             \item Which of the two systems is more complex? Why?
         \end{itemize}
-        Svar
+denna bör nog du ge dig på
         \subsubsection{Which method of gathering metrics - from UML designs or source
         code - is less time consuming?}
-            svar
+denna bör nog du ge dig på
   \section{External product attributes}
     \subsection{Describe how the external product attributes differ from the
     internal ones. Describe the connection between external and