| 1 |
%Assignment is conducted in pairs. |
| 2 |
%8-12 pages. |
| 3 |
%Deadline 14/1 |
| 4 |
\documentclass[12pt, a4paper]{article} |
| 5 |
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
\begin{document} |
| 8 |
\pagenumbering{roman} |
| 9 |
\title{Assignment 3 - PAC003: Software Metrics, 5p} |
| 10 |
\author{Jonas Petersson \& Mathias Börjeson\\ |
| 11 |
\emph{jopd01@student.bth.se \& tb00mbo@student.bth.se}} |
| 12 |
\maketitle |
| 13 |
\thispagestyle{empty} |
| 14 |
% \begin{centering} |
| 15 |
% Assignment 3 - PAC003: Software Metrics, 5p\\ |
| 16 |
% Jonas Petersson \& Mathias Börjeson\\ |
| 17 |
% \emph{jopd01@student.bth.se \& tb00mbo@student.bth.se}\\ |
| 18 |
% \end{centering} |
| 19 |
\newpage |
| 20 |
\tableofcontents |
| 21 |
\newpage |
| 22 |
\pagenumbering{arabic} |
| 23 |
\section{Goals of the metric program} |
| 24 |
The goals of this metric program are: |
| 25 |
\begin{itemize} |
| 26 |
\item Make project development less chaotic |
| 27 |
\item Not to make the same mistake twice |
| 28 |
\item To be able to get sensible data out of comparing a project with previous ones |
| 29 |
\end{itemize} |
| 30 |
Description of CMM Level 2 according to ProDX:\\ |
| 31 |
``\textbf{Repeatable.} Project Management processes (good, bad, or indifferent) exist. People actually follow those processes no matter how dire the situation or late the hour. Managers don't demand high-risk shortcuts to rescue troubled projects. Two similar projects generally require similar resources and time to complete. Estimates can be based on historical information, and are usually reasonable.'' |
| 32 |
\section{Achieving the goals} |
| 33 |
One word: Bribes |
| 34 |
\section{Where and when?} |
| 35 |
My place or yours? |
| 36 |
\section{Who should measure and collect} |
| 37 |
Mom? |
| 38 |
\section{How to store the data} |
| 39 |
In a plastic cup |
| 40 |
\section{Feasibility analysis} |
| 41 |
Feasiwho? |
| 42 |
\end{document} |
Parent Directory
| 
Revision Log